On the brink of madness

Why are we so shocked and so surprised at the New York State legislature’s decision regarding abortion? Canada is way ahead of the eight-ball on this one; to our great shame.
https://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/abortion/A few Canadian facts: In R. v. Morgentaler, 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada made its landmark decision to throw out the 1969 abortion law on the basis that it was 'unconstitutional'.

(1) This created a legal vacuum in which, to this day, no abortion law exists in Canada.
Abortion is permitted throughout all 9 months of pregnancy, for any reason, up to the moment of birth. Section 223 of the Criminal Code of Canada defines a human being as ‘a child that has completely proceeded from the body of its mother.’(2) This section strips pre-born human beings of their human right to life.  Abortions are funded with taxpayer dollars through every provincial health care system. This, despite the fact that polls show a majority of Canadians, 67% in a 2011 poll, significantly disagree with their dollars being used to kill babies. (3) The Canada Health Act does not require abortion costs to be insured. It states only that "medically necessary" procedures must be insured.(4)Almost all abortions are not medically necessary. Provincial legislatures can pass a law recognizing this fact at any time.

Back to New York:

“(NEW YORK, New York, January 23, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) directed that the One World Trade Center's spire be lit pink overnight on Tuesday to celebrate his signing of a law allowing abortions until birth and letting non-doctors commit abortions. The law, the Reproductive Health Act, also erases the state’s recognition of preborn babies older than 24 weeks as potential homicide victims. The new law also means that women whose unborn babies are killed against their will – in cases of domestic violence, for example – won’t be able to charge their aggressors.”

So, let me get this straight…

1. The most dangerous place for a baby to live is inside her mother’s womb.

2. If someone kills a woman who is in her third trimester of pregnancy, the murderer will not be charged with the baby’s death; justice is NOT served. Abusive men will get away with murder; they will harm the mother, and kill the baby in the womb. What’s to stop them?

3. Signing this legislation into law on the anniversary of Roe vs. Wade is no mistake or coincidence; evil begets evil. The slippery slope can hardly get any more slippery; unless you also take into account the fact that, in the Netherlands, a child can ask to be euthanized to alleviate the grief and suffering of their parents; Toronto Sick Kids Hospital now has a team of professionals looking into this very possible scenario since “medical aid in dying” is now available in Canada…

4. “Letting non-doctors commit abortions.” Isn’t that one of the reasons why people screamed for the legalization of abortions, so medical doctors could perform ‘safe abortions?’ How ironic is that? Safe for whom? The baby?

5. The “One World Trade Centre,” built to replace the Twin Towers that were destroyed by evil men, was symbolically lit up in pink, to celebrate the passing of this bill. Could it be more ignominious, this celebration of death?

Proverbs 24:11,12 

Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.

If you say, “But we knew nothing about this,” 

does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? 

Does not he who guards your life know it? 

Will he not repay everyone according to what they have done? 

Canada, we have blood on our hands. New York State, you have blood on your hands. No one can honestly say that a pre-born baby, at nine months, is not a child. Using semantics as a shield for murder; sounds like the Nazis calling Jews rats, or the Hutus calling the Tutsis cockroaches.

Only repentance will draw us back from the brink of madness.